Yes, pollock is considered a good fish to eat. It is a mild-flavored white fish, commonly used in dishes like fish sticks and imitation crab meat. Pollock is low in fat and calories, high in protein, and a good source of omega-3 fatty acids, which are beneficial for heart health. It is also typically more sustainable than some other fish options, making it an environmentally friendly choice. However, as with any seafood, it's important to consider sourcing and sustainability practices when purchasing.

Pollock fish is relatively inexpensive due to several factors. Firstly, it is abundant in the North Pacific Ocean, making it readily available for fishing. The fishing methods used for Pollock, such as trawling, can yield large quantities at once, further driving down costs. Additionally, Pollock is often processed into lower-cost products like fish sticks and surimi (imitation crab), which increases its market appeal. Lastly, strong competition in the seafood market and efficient supply chains contribute to keeping prices low.

Pollock is a type of fish belonging to the cod family, specifically the genus *Pollachius*. It is commonly found in the North Atlantic Ocean and is known for its mild flavor and flaky texture. There are two main species: Atlantic pollock and Pacific pollock. Atlantic pollock is often used in fish and chips, while Pacific pollock is widely used for processing into products like surimi, which is used to make imitation crab meat. Pollock is also a popular choice for fish sandwiches and is considered a sustainable seafood option.

"Pollock" is a biographical film about the renowned American painter Jackson Pollock, focusing on his life, struggles, and artistic development. It is well-regarded for its performances, particularly Ed Harris as Pollock, and its portrayal of the Abstract Expressionist movement. If you're comparing the film to cod in terms of culinary quality, they serve different purposes: "Pollock" is a significant artistic work, while cod is a popular fish. Both can be appreciated in their own contexts, but they cater to different tastes—art versus food.