The musical "Hair" was controversial primarily for its explicit portrayal of the counterculture movement of the 1960s, including themes of anti-war sentiment, sexual liberation, and drug use. It challenged societal norms by featuring full nudity, profanity, and a frank discussion of topics like race and free love. The show’s celebration of the hippie lifestyle and its critique of conventional values sparked debates about morality and artistic expression, making it a significant cultural touchstone that reflected the tumultuous social changes of the era.

The movie "Hair," directed by Milos Forman and based on the Broadway musical, explores themes of love, freedom, and the counterculture movement of the 1960s. It follows Claude, a young man who arrives in New York City and becomes involved with a group of hippies. The film highlights the clash between the ideals of peace and love advocated by the hippie movement and the societal expectations of the establishment, especially regarding the Vietnam War. Ultimately, "Hair" serves as a poignant commentary on the pursuit of individuality and social change during a tumultuous era.

In the musical "Hair," Claude Bukowski is a young man from the Midwest who moves to New York City and becomes involved with a group of hippies. He grapples with societal expectations and his desire to avoid the Vietnam War. Ultimately, Claude is drafted, and despite his internal conflict, he struggles with the idea of going to war. In a poignant climax, he decides to go to Vietnam, symbolizing the loss of innocence and the harsh realities faced by young people during the turbulent 1960s. His fate reflects the tragic impact of war.

The movie "Hair" (1979) differs from the original stage musical in several ways. While both portray the counterculture of the 1960s and themes of love, peace, and anti-war sentiment, the film introduces a more narrative-driven plot and expands on character backstories, particularly focusing on Claude and his journey. The film also includes new songs and alters some existing ones, while the visual style emphasizes the era's vibrancy. Additionally, the film's ending is more dramatic and conclusive compared to the more open-ended nature of the stage version.