Yes, "Blade Runner" (1982) and "Blade Runner 2049" (2017) are connected as they exist in the same universe and continue the narrative established in the original film. "Blade Runner" introduces a dystopian future where synthetic beings called replicants are created, while "Blade Runner 2049," set 30 years later, follows a new blade runner, K (played by Ryan Gosling), who uncovers secrets that could alter the relationship between humans and replicants. The sequel expands on themes of identity, humanity, and morality introduced in the original film.

In "Blade Runner 2049," Ryan Gosling plays K, a replicant who is a blade runner tasked with hunting down older model replicants. The film explores themes of identity and humanity, leaving some ambiguity about K's nature. While he is a replicant, the story delves into his quest for purpose and the possibility of him being more than just a machine. His journey raises questions about what it means to be human, especially in relation to emotions and memories, which are central to the narrative.

"Blade Runner 2049," directed by Denis Villeneuve, is considered a critical success but a commercial disappointment. Released in October 2017, it received praise for its visuals, direction, and performances, particularly by Ryan Gosling and Harrison Ford. However, it struggled at the box office, grossing around $260 million against a production budget of approximately $150 million, not including marketing costs. Despite its lackluster financial performance, it has gained a strong following and is regarded as a significant film in contemporary science fiction.

The most famous line from "Blade Runner" is "All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain." This poignant quote is delivered by the character Roy Batty, played by Rutger Hauer, during a pivotal scene. It encapsulates themes of mortality, memory, and the transient nature of life, highlighting the emotional depth of the film and its exploration of what it means to be human. The line has become iconic, often referenced in discussions about the film and its philosophical implications.